13 October 2026, 10:00 UTC

Kyoto Sanga vs Ratchaburi AFC Champions League Elite prediction & result

Sanga Stadium by Kyocera, Kyoto
Referee: Qasim Matar Ali Al-Hatmi
Full time1 – 0

Final score: Kyoto Sanga 1-0 Ratchaburi.

Before kick-off the model made it 61% Kyoto Sanga, 20% draw, 19% Ratchaburi — fair odds of 1.64, 5.00 and 5.26.

Most likely scoreline: 2-1.

The model called the result correctly.

Published · updated

Has the model earned this number?

Kyoto Sanga at 61%: of 1,648 settled 50–65% forecasts, 58.6% came in (average 55.4%). It can be read literally. The full record.

How the model saw it, minute by minute

Kyoto Sanga96%Draw4%Ratchaburi0%

Rebuilt after the match from the model's pre-match expected goals, frozen in the log before kick-off, plus the score and cards as they stood at each minute — never anything later. A ball marks each of the 1 goal. The same replay scores the in-play model on the track record.

Match analysis

Match timeline

11'
Jesse Curran
🔁Ren Katoout: Ryuma Nakano
15'
44'
🔁Pablo Insuaout: Daniel Ting
🔁Thiago Sousa Limaout: Shimpei Fukuoka
45'
🔁Marco Túlioout: Temma Matsuda
59'
🔁Everton Maceióout: Alex Souza
59'
74'
🔁Bruno Mendesout: Chotipat Poomkaew
79'
Roque Mesa
⚽Temma Matsudaassist: Haruki Arai
88'
90+2'
•Pedro Tanausú Domínguez Placeres
🔁Takaaki Shichiout: Kodai Nagata
90+3'
90+8'
🔁Roque Mesaout: Thossawat Limwannasthian

Match stats — Kyoto Sanga vs Ratchaburi

46%Possession54%
13Shots10
5On target5
7Corners4
1.2xG0.37

Goals against chances

Kyoto Sanga1 from 1.20 xGabout what the chances were worth
Ratchaburi0 from 0.37 xGabout what the chances were worth

Expected goals totals what the openings were worth, so the gap between it and the score is the finishing — and the luck. Under half a goal either way is called level: xG is an estimate and a smaller gap than that is inside its own error.

Line-ups

Kyoto Sanga 3-4-3
  • 90HallsG
  • 5H. TawiahD
  • 43WevertonD
  • 62T. ShichiD
  • 26R. KatoM
  • 14ThiagoM
  • 25Yoon Sung-JunM
  • 44K. SatoM
  • 77H. AraiF
  • 38EvertonF
  • 11Marco TúlioF
Substitutes
  • 50Y. SuzukiD
  • 10S. FukuokaM
  • 40Y. IshidaD
  • 21K. KakoiG
  • 18T. MatsudaM
  • 15K. NagataD
  • 48R. NakanoM
  • 1G. OtaG
  • 19David Da Silva CostaF
Coach: R. Popović
Ratchaburi 4-2-3-1
  • 99K. PhatomakkakulG
  • 27J. CurranD
  • 3Tarek AggounD
  • 44Pablo InsuaD
  • 31S. van WermeskerkenD
  • 16Roque MesaM
  • 8T. SuengchitthawonM
  • 92Njiva RakotoharimalalaM
  • 6TanaM
  • 21E. PanyaM
  • 9Bruno MendesF
Substitutes
  • 97U. WongmeemaG
  • 5D. TingD
  • 15A. PromrakD
  • 88C. PoomkaewM
  • 20Sanchai NontasilaD
  • 28T. LimwanasathianM
  • 48S. AllardiceM
Coach: W. Srimaka

Form going into Kyoto Sanga vs Ratchaburi

Kyoto Sanga

AFC Champions League Elite

  • L0-1away to Daejeon Citizen15 September 2026

Ratchaburi

AFC Champions League Elite

  • L4-6SHANGHAI SIPG15 September 2026

Up to 5 matches before kick-off, most recent first; context, not the model's input. How to read this.

AFC Champions League Elite table

#TeamPWDLGFGAGDPts
6Kyoto Sanga421163+37
14Ratchaburi4013610-41

Where the two sides stand today, not on the day of this match. Full table

Leading scorers: Kyoto Sanga and Ratchaburi

Kyoto Sanga

GoalsAssists

  • Alex Negueba21

Ratchaburi

GoalsAssists

  • Martin Njiva Rakotoharimalala31

Top 3 by league goals this season; player availability is not in the model. How to read this.

The result against the call

Kyoto Sanga beat Ratchaburi 1–0. The model had made a win for Kyoto Sanga its most likely outcome, at 61%, so the call held; the score it named was 2–1. The goal: Temma Matsuda 88' for Kyoto Sanga. On expected goals it finished 1.20–0.37.

How the call on Kyoto Sanga v Ratchaburi has moved

First published on 29 Sep at 55% / 23% / 22% (home / draw / away). By kick-off, after 2 updates, it read 61% / 20% / 19%: the biggest move is Kyoto Sanga's chance of winning, up 6 points.

  1. Kyoto Sanga win61%▲ +6
  2. Draw20%▼ −3
  3. Ratchaburi win19%▼ −3

Each update is a full rebuild of both sides' ratings from the latest results, and now and then a change to the model itself. The thin mark is the first published figure.

Statistical estimate, not betting advice This prediction is generated from a statistical model for entertainment and informational purposes only. It does not guarantee any outcome and should not be used as the basis for placing a bet.