24 October 2026, 16:30 UTC

Chelsea vs Tottenham Premier League prediction & result

Stamford Bridge, London
Referee: Chris Kavanagh, England
Full time0 – 2

Final score: Chelsea 0-2 Tottenham.

Before kick-off the model made it 53% Chelsea, 24% draw, 23% Tottenham — fair odds of 1.89, 4.17 and 4.35.

Most likely scoreline: 2-1.

The model got this one wrong.

Published

Has the model earned this number?

Chelsea at 53%: of 1,648 settled 50–65% forecasts, 58.6% came in (average 55.4%). It can be read literally. The full record.

Match analysis

Match timeline

51'
🔁James Maddisonout: Conor Gallagher
🔁Jorrel Hatoout: Marco Palestra
65'
65'
🔁Omar Marmoushout: Dominic Solanke
65'
🔁Andrew Robertsonout: Pedro Porro
67'
Conor Gallagher
71'
Micky van de Ven
Cole Palmer
71'
72'
Mateus Fernandes
72'
Roberto De Zerbi
🔁Geovany Quendaout: Estêvão Willian Almeida de Oliveira Gonçalves
72'
77'
⚽Mike Penders (OG)
Pedro Neto
79'
Cole Palmer
80'
87'
⚽Mathys Tel
🔁Pedro Netoout: Danny Welbeck
88'
89'
🔁Mathys Telout: Ben Davies
89'
🔁Mohammed Kudusout: Dejan Kulusevski
Morgan Rogers
90+1'

Match stats — Chelsea vs Tottenham

32%Possession68%
7Shots15
4On target4
4Corners6
0.51xG0.8

Goals against chances

Chelsea0 from 0.51 xGless than the chances were worth
Tottenham2 from 0.80 xGmore than the chances were worth

Expected goals totals what the openings were worth, so the gap between it and the score is the finishing — and the luck. Under half a goal either way is called level: xG is an estimate and a smaller gap than that is inside its own error.

Line-ups

Chelsea 3-4-2-1
  • 39M. PendersG
  • 34Joshua Kofi AcheampongD
  • 5M. LacroixD
  • 6L. ColwillD
  • 7Pedro NetoM
  • 25M. CaicedoM
  • 14J. HendersonM
  • 21J. HatoM
  • 10C. PalmerM
  • 23Geovany Tcherno QuendaM
  • 17M. RogersF
Substitutes
  • 28T. Sharman-LoweG
  • 27M. GustoD
  • 2M. PalestraD
  • 4V. BarcoM
  • 45R. LaviaM
  • 32M. Nicoll-JazuliM
  • 41EstêvãoF
  • 18D. WelbeckF
  • 3W. FofanaD
Coach: Xabi Alonso
Tottenham 4-2-3-1
  • 31A. KinskýG
  • 14A. GrayD
  • 6J. van HeckeD
  • 37M. van de VenD
  • 3A. RobertsonD
  • 18Mateus FernandesM
  • 16S. TonaliM
  • 20M. KudusM
  • 10J. MaddisonM
  • 11M. TelM
  • 22Omar MarmoushF
Substitutes
  • 19D. SolankeF
  • 68L. Williams-BarnettM
  • 52Callum Latif OlusesiM
  • 21D. KulusevskiM
  • 8C. GallagherM
  • 33B. DaviesD
  • 23Pedro PorroD
  • 5M. SenesiD
  • 39M. DúbravkaG
Coach: R. De Zerbi

Form going into Chelsea vs Tottenham

Chelsea

Premier League

  • W2-0away to Everton17 October 2026
  • W5-1Bournemouth10 October 2026

Tottenham

Premier League

  • W3-1Coventry19 October 2026
  • D1-1away to Manchester United10 October 2026

Up to 5 matches before kick-off, most recent first; context, not the model's input. How to read this.

Premier League table

#TeamPWDLGFGAGDPts
5Chelsea105141916+316
11Tottenham103341011-112

Where the two sides stand today, not on the day of this match. Full table

Head-to-head: Chelsea vs Tottenham

Chelsea and Tottenham have met 7 times in the records we hold, Chelsea has won 5 of them to Tottenham's 2.

The record

Tottenham won the last one 2–0 on 24 Oct 2026.

ClubWDLGFGA
Chelsea502118
Tottenham205811

Between them these 7 meetings produced 19 goals, an average of 2.71 a game.

Every meeting

Every recorded meeting, newest first.

  • 24 Oct 2026
    Premier League
    Chelsea 0–2 Tottenham
  • 1 Aug 2026
    Friendlies Clubs
    Chelsea 1–2 Tottenham
  • 19 May 2026
    Premier League
    Chelsea 2–1 Tottenham
  • 1 Nov 2025
    Premier League
    Tottenham 0–1 Chelsea
  • 3 Apr 2025
    Premier League
    Chelsea 1–0 Tottenham
  • 8 Dec 2024
    Premier League
    Tottenham 3–4 Chelsea
  • 2 May 2024
    Premier League
    Chelsea 2–0 Tottenham

How the model rates them now

On the current ratings, Chelsea's attack rates 43% above Tottenham's, and Tottenham concede 13% fewer than Chelsea. How the ratings are derived.

ClubAttackDefence
Chelsea1.231.03
Tottenham0.860.90

More head-to-heads on this week’s board →

Leading scorers: Chelsea and Tottenham

Chelsea

GoalsAssists

  • João Pedro53
  • M. Rogers51
  • Pedro Neto31

Tottenham

No player in Premier League's leading scorers — 10 league goals as a side.

Top 3 by league goals this season; player availability is not in the model. How to read this.

The result against the call

Tottenham won 2–0 at Chelsea. The model had leaned towards a win for Chelsea at 53% and given a win for Tottenham 23%. At that figure it expects the outcome about once in every 4 matches like this one. The goals: Mike Penders (own goal) 77' for Tottenham, Mathys Tel 87' for Tottenham. Sent off: Cole Palmer (Chelsea) 80'. On expected goals it finished 0.51–0.80.

What this result changed

Before kick-off the season simulation gave Chelsea a 22.6% chance to finish in the top four: 24.8% after a win, 20.3% after a draw, 17.7% after a defeat. The defeat was the worst of those results for them, and left the figure at 17.7%, 4.9 points lower than before the match.

For Tottenham the question was the chance to finish in the bottom three, 37.1% going in: 30.3% after a win, 34.6% after a draw, 40.3% after a defeat. The win was the best of those results for them, and left the figure at 30.3%, 6.8 points lower than before the match.

Read from our Premier League season simulation as it stood before this match (10,000 runs), counting this result alone. Every result since then has moved the table again, so today's figure is on the competition page.

How the call on Chelsea v Tottenham has moved

First published on 10 Oct at 51% / 24% / 25% (home / draw / away). By kick-off, after 5 updates, it read 53% / 24% / 23%: the biggest move is Chelsea's chance of winning, up 2 points.

  1. Chelsea win53%▲ +2
  2. Draw24%=
  3. Tottenham win23%▼ −2

Each update is a full rebuild of both sides' ratings from the latest results, and now and then a change to the model itself. The thin mark is the first published figure.

Statistical estimate, not betting advice This prediction is generated from a statistical model for entertainment and informational purposes only. It does not guarantee any outcome and should not be used as the basis for placing a bet.